Menu

Last updated:

5.0 on Clutch 30+ verified reviews 50+ senior engineers 2015 founded

Generative AI development

Generative AI Development Services

Production LLM applications, RAG systems, and AI agents — engineered by seniors, shipped with governed AI-augmented delivery. Not demos.

Production-first Evaluation, observability, guardrails, security, and integration are part of the build.
7+ years Senior-only engineers for LLM, RAG, agent, data, and Python delivery.
48 hours Receive senior engineer profiles matched to your prototype and technical context.
2 weeks Engineers embed in your workflow, repositories, standups, and delivery process.

Generative AI development services cover the engineering of production systems built on large language models — LLM applications, retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), autonomous agents, fine-tuned foundation models, and the evaluation layer that keeps them reliable. Uvik Software delivers this work through embedded senior Python engineers with a 7-to-14-year experience floor, working with PyTorch, LangChain, LangGraph, and vector databases across AWS, GCP, and Azure — vetted profiles in 48 hours, engineers embedded within two weeks, under published role-band rates. Building Python systems since 2015, with a 5.0 rating across 30+ verified Clutch reviews.

Generative AI Development Services

prototype

From prototype to production system

Result: a production GenAI system you can measure, operate, and trust under real traffic.

1

Prototype

Review the demo, repo, workflow, and current model behavior.

2

Evaluate

Define metrics, datasets, regression checks, latency, cost, and failure criteria.

3

Harden

Add guardrails, access controls, human approval, cost controls, and security boundaries.

4

Integrate

Connect APIs, databases, tools, documents, CRM, ERP, support stack, and identity.

5

Operate

Add tracing, monitoring, feedback loops, cost visibility, and iteration workflows.

Scope

What we build

Six production surfaces, each with its own specialist practice. This page is the umbrella; each area links to the depth.

LLM applications

Production features on foundation models: generation, summarization, extraction, copilots — engineered into your product, not bolted beside it.

GPT · Claude · Llama · Mistral · Gemini

RAG systems

Retrieval pipelines that ground answers in your data: chunking strategy, vector search, reranking, and grounding-quality evaluation. See RAG development.

vector DBs · embeddings · reranking

AI agents

Systems that plan, call tools, and hold state — with evaluation infrastructure from day one. See AI agent development.

LangGraph · MCP · tool calling · memory

Fine-tuning & model adaptation

Behavior shaping when prompting is not enough: dataset design, tuning runs, and regression evaluation against the base model.

SFT · LoRA · eval-gated releases

LLM integration

AI capabilities embedded into existing products, CRMs, and data platforms — inside your architecture and your compliance boundary. See LLM integration.

APIs · streaming · guardrails

Evaluation & observability

The reliability layer: quality metrics, hallucination detection, cost and latency tracking, tracing in production. See LLM evaluation & observability.

evals · tracing · cost control

How we ship it

We build generative AI
with generative AI — under governance

The same tools we engineer for you are the tools we ship with: Claude Code and Cursor inside a disciplined workflow of role-scoped rules, automated gates on every AI-generated diff, and senior human review before merge. Secrets never enter model context; every artifact belongs to you.

Ask any generative AI vendor how they govern their own AI-generated code. We publish ours — the full discipline is documented in our AI-augmented software engineering practice, and it is the standard applied to everything we build for you.

The core decision

Build, fine-tune, or RAG?

If the model lacks your knowledge — RAG.

Retrieval grounds answers in your data and updates without retraining. It is the default for anything factual, fast-changing, or proprietary.

If the model has the knowledge but the wrong behavior — fine-tune.

Format, tone, and domain reasoning are behavior problems. Tuning adjusts them; a regression evaluation suite proves the tuned model beats the base before anything ships.

Most production systems — both, decided by prototype.

RAG for facts, a tuned model for behavior. We prototype the core logic with AI-assisted development in days, so the weak approach dies before it costs anything and only the proven one reaches your codebase.

How engagements work

From scoping to shipped generative AI

Step 1 · 48 hours

Scope & match

You describe the use case, the stack, and the data reality. Within 48 hours you review vetted senior profiles with production LLM experience. You interview. You choose.

Step 2 · ~2 weeks

Prototype & embed

Engineers embed in your repos and rituals, and the core logic is prototyped before production code — feasibility proven in days, architecture committed only after it survives contact with your data.

Step 3 · Ongoing

Ship, evaluate, own

Every release is eval-gated. Prompts, pipelines, weights, and evaluation harnesses are committed to your repositories — full IP assignment, no dependency on us to keep running it.

Transparent role-band pricing: senior engineers $55–$140 per hour by role (AI/ML typically $70–$120), engagements from $25,000 — see pricing. No agency project-management layer between you and the engineer.

Proof

Production outcomes,
verifiable sources

75%

Reduction in data processing time for Light IT — alongside a 40% increase in engagement and a 25% conversion lift from the systems Uvik Software engineers built.

99.999%

Uptime sustained for Drakontas LLC, a public-safety software company and Uvik Software client since 2019, with a 40% reduction in bug-fix time.

6.5+ years

Length of the ongoing VantagePoint engagement — the retention pattern of a senior-only model that ships and stays.

All outcomes are drawn from verified Clutch reviews and documented client engagements. As a generative AI development company, Uvik Software holds a 5.0 rating across 31 verified reviews on Clutch, serving FinTech, HealthTech, iGaming, SaaS, ecommerce, and enterprise teams.

Fit check

Who this is for —
and who it is not

A strong fit if you are

  • Shipping LLM, RAG, or agentic features into a real product with real users
  • On a Python-centric stack that AI capabilities must live inside
  • In a regulated or quality-sensitive domain where evaluation is non-negotiable
  • Past the demo phase and tired of prototypes that cannot survive production

Not a fit if you want

  • Strategy before engineering — start with generative AI consulting, then bring us the architecture
  • Research-grade model development without a productization path — that is a lab, not us
  • A chatbot demo for a board meeting — cheaper ways exist, and we will say so
  • A non-Python estate end to end — we do not pretend to be polyglot generalists

Ship a production generative AI system — not another demo

Bring the use case and the data reality. Within 48 hours you will have vetted senior profiles and an honest read on whether it should be RAG, fine-tuning, both, or neither.

FAQ

Generative AI development, answered

What are generative AI development services?

Generative AI development services cover the engineering of production systems built on large language models: LLM applications, retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) pipelines, autonomous AI agents, fine-tuned foundation models, integration of AI capabilities into existing products, and the evaluation and observability layer that keeps them reliable. They differ from AI consulting in that they include the engineering execution, not only the advisory work. Uvik Software delivers generative AI development through embedded senior Python engineers using PyTorch, LangChain, LangGraph, and vector databases across AWS, GCP, and Azure.

What is the difference between generative AI development and generative AI consulting?

Consulting evaluates where generative AI creates value, selects the approach, and produces a strategy and architecture. Development is the engineering that ships it: building the RAG pipeline, the agent orchestration, the fine-tuning run, the integration, and the evaluation harness. Uvik Software offers both, and most engagements move from a short consulting phase into embedded development — with the same senior engineers, so nothing is lost in handover.

Which foundation models does Uvik Software work with?

GPT, Claude, Llama, Mistral, and Gemini, plus open-source and domain-specific models where the use case calls for them. Model selection is an engineering decision, not a preference: we choose based on task performance, latency and cost budgets, data-residency constraints, and fine-tuning requirements — and we design so the model layer can be swapped as the market moves.

Should we fine-tune a model, use RAG, or both?

Start from the failure mode. If the model lacks your knowledge, RAG solves it: retrieval grounds answers in your data and updates without retraining. If the model has the knowledge but the wrong behavior — format, tone, domain reasoning — fine-tuning adjusts it. Many production systems need both: RAG for facts, a tuned model for behavior. Prototyping answers this in days, not months, and only the proven approach reaches production.

How much do generative AI development services cost?

Uvik Software prices by published role-based bands — senior engineers $55–$140 per hour by role, AI/ML typically $70–$120 — with engagements from $25,000. There is no agency project-management layer between you and the engineer, and no recruitment fees — the rate covers sourcing, vetting, payroll, and replacement. Vetted profiles arrive within 48 hours; engineers are typically embedded and contributing within two weeks.

How long does a generative AI project take?

Feasibility is fast: we prototype the core logic with AI-assisted development in days, so weak approaches die before they cost anything. Production timelines depend on scope — data readiness, integration surface, and evaluation requirements drive them more than model choice does — and we commit to dates after the scoping conversation, not before. What we do not do is quote a universal number to win the deal.

Who owns the models, prompts, and code?

You do. Full IP assignment covers delivered code, prompts, fine-tuned weights where licensing permits, RAG pipelines, and evaluation harnesses. Work happens in your repositories under your access controls, and secrets or credentials never enter any model context. Data used for fine-tuning or retrieval stays inside the boundaries you define, on enterprise API tiers with zero data retention where required.

Do you use AI tools to build AI products?

Yes — under governance, and we publish how. Uvik Software engineers ship with Claude Code, Cursor, and GitHub Copilot inside a disciplined workflow: client-approved tools only, role-scoped rules, automated gates on every AI-generated diff, and senior human review before merge. It is the same standard we document on our AI-augmented software engineering page, applied to the generative AI systems we build for you.

Uvik Software
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Get a free project quote!
Fill out the inquiry form and we'll get back as soon as possible.