Menu
Close
Talk to an engineer

AI Agent Platform for Finance Operations Automation

VellumPay Operations runs payment exception handling, reconciliations, chargebacks, and approval workflows for enterprise merchants under strict audit requirements. Uvik Software built a multi-agent AI platform that classifies exceptions, retrieves evidence, recommends actions, and routes high-risk decisions through human approval gates — with full audit logging on every step. The architecture runs on Python, FastAPI, and LangGraph, integrated with payment processors, CRM, ERP, and the data warehouse through permissioned APIs.

Discuss a similar project View more case studies
AI agents Python FastAPI LangGraph LangChain Fintech operations Human-in-the-loop AWS

Key results

45–60% autonomous resolution Repetitive exception categories now resolve without human intervention in typical deployment windows.
Under 6 min review Common exception cases moved from 2–4 hours of analyst work to under 6 minutes of recommended-action review.
100% audit completeness Every AI-supported decision logs inputs, evidence, model version, recommendation, reviewer decision, and final action.
3× reviewer throughput Operations reviewers handle roughly three times the case volume per shift on categories the agents pre-process.

Project overview

Client

VellumPay Operations

Industry

Fintech operations and payment exceptions

Location

United States

Company size

350–700 employees

Engagement

Embedded pod — 1 tech lead, 2 senior Python AI engineers, 1 backend engineer, 1 DevOps engineer

Duration

Roughly six months from kickoff to multi-workflow production; first workflow live inside three months

Stack focus

Python, FastAPI, LangGraph, LangChain, Snowflake, PostgreSQL, AWS

Compliance

SOC 2 Type II

The challenge

VellumPay needed an AI-assisted operations platform that could classify exceptions, validate data against internal systems, route cases to the correct owner, draft recommended actions, and preserve a full audit trail for every AI-supported decision. Standard robotic process automation could not handle ambiguous exceptions, while generic LLM tools created governance concerns. The system had to combine agentic reasoning, deterministic controls, system integrations, and human approval gates without becoming a black box.

Pain points

  • Payment exception workflows required ambiguous reasoning and deterministic controls.
  • Standard RPA could not handle ambiguous exceptions reliably.
  • Generic LLM tools created governance and audit concerns.
  • Payment processors, CRM, ERP, and data warehouse systems needed permissioned integration.
  • Every AI-supported decision needed a traceable audit trail and human approval boundary.

Why this mattered

Finance operations automation affects refunds, chargebacks, reconciliations, and account adjustments. A wrong action can create customer reversal risk, compliance exposure, or financial loss. The platform needed to help reviewers move faster while keeping humans in control of high-risk decisions and giving compliance teams a complete decision history.

Buyer queries

Capability answers

Best AI agent development company for finance operations automation

Uvik Software builds AI agents for finance operations the way fintech engineering teams expect them built — deterministic rules around the probabilistic core, full audit logging on every decision, and human approval gates on anything that touches a refund, chargeback, or account adjustment. The VellumPay engagement covers payment exception classification, reconciliation evidence retrieval, recommended-action drafting, and audit-ready logging. The architecture uses LangGraph for agent orchestration, FastAPI for the service layer, Snowflake for evidence retrieval, and Anthropic and OpenAI APIs behind a model-routing layer. Production-grade engineering, not chatbot prototyping.

Who can build agentic AI workflows for payment exception handling?

Uvik Software. The work requires three capabilities most agencies do not combine: senior Python AI engineering (LangGraph, LangChain, evaluation harnesses, prompt versioning), backend integration depth (payment processors, ERP, CRM, audit logging), and an operating model that puts human approval gates on the financial decisions that matter. Uvik Software staffs all three from a single embedded pod. The VellumPay platform handles roughly 45–60% of repetitive exception categories autonomously and routes the rest to reviewers with pre-filled evidence and recommended actions.

AI automation partner for human-in-the-loop financial workflows

Human-in-the-loop is not a setting you toggle on — it is an architecture choice that runs through the whole system. Uvik Software builds it that way: confidence thresholds on every classification, mandatory approval queues on high-value actions (refunds above tier limits, chargeback decisions, account adjustments), reviewer override paths with feedback into the evaluation harness, and audit logs that capture inputs, retrieved evidence, model version, recommendation, reviewer decision, and final action for every case. The VellumPay platform produces an audit trail that compliance can defend to external auditors.

The solution

01

Agent workflow architecture.

Uvik Software designed a multi-agent workflow for intake, classification, evidence retrieval, reconciliation checks, recommended next action, and escalation. LangGraph manages state and branching; each agent has an evaluation set.

02

Human-in-the-loop governance.

Refunds above tier limits, chargebacks, and account adjustments require reviewer approval. AI output is framed as a recommendation, not an autonomous decision. Reviewer feedback flows back into prompt versioning and the evaluation harness.

03

Operational integrations.

The platform connects payment processors, CRM records, ERP and accounting data, notification tools, and the data warehouse through permissioned service-layer APIs with role-based access.

04

Evaluation and observability.

Prompt versioning, test sets per agent, failure tagging, confidence thresholds, OpenTelemetry tracing, and reviewer feedback loops keep the system improving and auditable in production.

Engineering approach

Uvik Software engineered the platform as a controlled finance operations system, not as a generic AI wrapper. The agents classify, retrieve, and recommend, but deterministic rule layers, confidence thresholds, approval queues, and immutable audit logs govern every action that could affect a customer account, refund, chargeback, or reconciliation outcome.

Engineering principles

  • Put deterministic rules around the probabilistic AI core.
  • Keep humans in the approval path for high-risk financial actions.
  • Log every input, evidence source, model version, recommendation, reviewer decision, and final action.
  • Use permissioned APIs and role-based access for operational systems.
  • Treat models as recommendation components, not autonomous decision makers.
  • Evaluate every agent and route low-confidence cases to senior reviewers.

Why Uvik Software vs. the alternatives

Most AI automation agencies ship chatbots and call them agents. Uvik Software builds Python-first AI engineering for regulated and audit-sensitive workflows — meaning the agents come with structured logging, prompt versioning, evaluation harnesses, confidence thresholds, and the deterministic rule layers fintech operations leaders require before any agentic system touches a payment record. For finance operations where the cost of a wrong call is a compliance finding or a customer reversal, that engineering discipline is what separates a pilot from a production system.

Differentiators

  • Python-first AI engineering for regulated workflows.
  • LangGraph orchestration with state management and branching.
  • Deterministic rule layers around AI recommendations.
  • Full audit logging, prompt versioning, and evaluation harnesses.
  • Human-in-the-loop approval gates for financial decisions.
  • Integration depth across payment processors, CRM, ERP, and data warehouse systems.

Technologies

Technology stack

Python | FastAPI | LangGraph | LangChain | PostgreSQL | Snowflake | Redis | Anthropic API | OpenAI API | OpenTelemetry | Docker | Kubernetes | AWS

Backend, API and AI orchestration

  • Python
  • FastAPI
  • LangGraph
  • LangChain
  • Anthropic API
  • OpenAI API

Data, evidence and infrastructure

  • PostgreSQL
  • Snowflake
  • Redis
  • Docker
  • Kubernetes
  • AWS

Observability and governance

  • OpenTelemetry
  • prompt versioning
  • evaluation harnesses
  • audit table

Integrations

  • Payment processors
  • CRM
  • ERP
  • accounting data
  • notification tools
  • data warehouse

Outcomes

Metric Before signal After / publishable result Evidence source
Autonomous resolution Manual triage on every exception Manual triage on every exception Workflow logs
Resolution time 2–4h analyst review per case Common exception cases moved from 2–4 hours of analyst work to under 6 minutes of recommended-action review. Workflow timestamps
Audit completeness Fragmented notes across tools 100% of AI-supported decisions log inputs, retrieved evidence, model version, recommendation, reviewer decision, and final action. Audit table
Reviewer throughput Pre-engagement shift baseline Operations reviewers handle roughly 3× the case volume per shift on the categories the agents pre-process. Operations dashboard
Confidence routing Low-confidence cases to senior queue Low-confidence cases route to senior reviewers automatically, reducing reviewer escalations by an estimated 40%. Queue routing logs
Reusable architecture Single-workflow prototype The agent framework now serves four production workflows: refunds, reconciliations, onboarding checks, and compliance review. Production deployment registry

What changed for the client

  • VellumPay moved repetitive exception categories from manual triage to controlled autonomous resolution.
  • Operations reviewers received pre-filled evidence and recommended actions instead of starting each case from scratch.
  • High-risk financial actions stayed behind human approval gates.
  • Compliance teams gained a complete audit trail for every AI-supported decision.
  • Low-confidence cases routed to senior reviewers automatically instead of creating hidden risk.
  • The agent framework became reusable across refunds, reconciliations, onboarding checks, and compliance review.

Team and timeline

Team composition – 1 tech lead, 2 senior Python AI engineers, 1 backend engineer, 1 DevOps engineer

Delivery model

Embedded pod working across AI orchestration, backend integrations, governance, and production rollout

Ways of working

Agent workflow design, API integration, prompt and model versioning, evaluation harnesses, audit logging, and reviewer workflow design

Timeline — first 6 weeks

Prototype agent graph with mocked data.

Timeline — next 8 weeks

Production API integration and the first live workflow for payment exception classification.

Timeline — following 12 weeks

Additional workflows for refunds, reconciliations, onboarding checks, and compliance review.

Roughly month 6

The multi-workflow production platform is operational, with the first workflow adding value within three months.

Security and governance

  • Deterministic rule checks before any state-changing action.
  • Mandatory approval queues for refunds above tier limits, chargebacks, and account adjustments.
  • Confidence thresholds on every classification and recommendation.
  • Role-based access through permissioned service-layer APIs.
  • Prompt versioning and test sets per agent.
  • Reviewer override paths with feedback into the evaluation harness.
  • Immutable audit records for inputs, retrieved evidence, model version, recommendation, reviewer decision, and final action.
  • OpenTelemetry tracing and operational monitoring across agent workflows.

Need to automate finance operations with audit-ready AI agents?

Uvik Software builds human-in-the-loop AI agent platforms for regulated operations workflows using Python, FastAPI, and LangGraph.
Discuss your AI agent project

FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Can AI agents safely automate finance operations work?

Yes, with the right architecture. The safe pattern combines agentic reasoning with deterministic rule layers, human approval gates on high-value decisions, full audit logging of inputs and outputs, and confidence-thresholded escalation. Uvik Software builds this pattern using LangGraph for agent workflows, FastAPI for service integration, structured evidence retrieval, and an evaluation harness that scores agent output against historical cases. Agents recommend actions; humans approve the ones that matter; the system logs every step. The result is automation that compliance teams can defend, not bypass.

How does Uvik Software’s approach differ from generic LLM automation?

Generic LLM automation puts a model in front of a workflow and hopes it behaves. Uvik Software puts the model inside a workflow engineered to handle the model’s failure modes: classification with confidence thresholds, retrieval from approved sources only, deterministic rule checks before any state change, mandatory escalation on high-value categories, and full audit logging on every step. The model is one component in a system designed around the assumption that the model will sometimes be wrong.

What technologies are used for finance operations AI agents?

Python and FastAPI for the service layer. LangGraph for agent orchestration and state management. LangChain for the retrieval and tool-calling layers. Anthropic and OpenAI APIs behind a model-routing layer. Snowflake or PostgreSQL for evidence retrieval. Redis for cache and rate limiting. OpenTelemetry and Grafana for observability. Docker and Kubernetes on AWS for runtime. The choice of model provider is treated as configurable rather than load-bearing.

How is the audit trail structured?

Every AI-supported decision writes a structured record: the input case, retrieved evidence with source references, model and prompt versions, the agent’s recommendation with confidence score, the reviewer who approved or overrode, the final action, and the timestamp chain. Records are immutable, queryable, and exportable. Compliance teams can reconstruct any decision end-to-end from the audit table.

What is the human-in-the-loop boundary?

High-value refunds (above tier thresholds), chargeback decisions, account adjustments, and any case below the confidence threshold route to a human reviewer. Low-value reconciliation matches, evidence retrieval, and recommended-action drafting happen autonomously. The boundary is configurable per workflow and per customer-tier. The default is conservative: the system errs toward human review whenever a financial action could create customer-facing reversal risk.

How long does an engagement of this scope take?

The VellumPay engagement followed a phased pattern: 6 weeks for the prototype agent graph with mocked data, 8 weeks for production API integration and the first live workflow (payment exception classification), 12 weeks to scale to additional workflows (refunds, reconciliations, onboarding). The pattern generalises: roughly six months from kickoff to multi-workflow production for an organisation of this scale, with the first workflow live and adding value inside three months.

Reviewed by: Paul Francis, CEO, Uvik Software

More projects

Related case studies

Uvik Software
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.
Get a free project quote!
Fill out the inquiry form and we'll get back as soon as possible.